|


Spring is always a time for
renewal. This season is a great time to reflect on the
accomplishments and struggles of this school year and look forward
to the planning and freshness of the upcoming year. I believe
teaching is a unique profession because teachers get the chance to
reboot every Fall. As teachers, we have the opportunity to try again
and continually improve ourselves and our instruction.
We thought that Spring was in the
air, but I woke up to snow on the ground this morning in North
Georgia. This school year has already turned the corner, and we are
heading for the home stretch, with one major hurdle - Georgia
Milestones - still on the horizon. While teachers and students
prepare for end of the year testing, GCTM is also busy preparing for
Summer Academies and the Georgia Math Conference at Rock Eagle in
October.
Registration is now open for the
2017 Summer Math Academies, which are headed to four locations
across Georgia in June and July. Sessions offered during the
institutes will include the following grade bands: Kindergarten –
1st grade, 2nd-3rd grade, 4th–5th grade, 6th–8th grade, Algebra,
Geometry, and Algebra II/Pre-Calculus with the TI-84. The Academies
will focus on Principles to Actions and participants will learn all
about:
-
Effective teaching strategies
for the mathematics classroom \
-
Engaging, higher order
thinking tasks aligned to grade band GSE standards, and
-
Classroom strategies to meet
the needs of ALL students
For more information about the
Summer Math Academies, visit the GCTM website and click on the
Academies tab or use the following link:
https://new.gctm-resources.org/gctm/dv7/?q=academies. We are very
excited about providing the opportunity for teachers to collaborate
and learn together to make all of us better instructors for each of
our students.
Preparations for the 2017 GCTM
Georgia Math Conference have been going on since October 2016. The
dates for the conference are October 18 through 20 at Rock Eagle 4-H
Center. We have our keynote speakers lined up and are finalizing the
logo. The theme for the conference is “Communicating Mathematics:
Creating a Culture for Discourse Fluency.” We are currently
accepting speaker proposals for breakout sessions. Please consider
presenting on what you are passionate about. You can find the
speaker proposal form on the GCTM website (www.gctm.org)
under the GMC at Rock Eagle tab.
In other news, GCTM was
recognized by the Georgia Senate on February 21, 2017 at the State
Capitol in Atlanta. This was our annual “Math Day at the Capitol.”
Five GCTM members were present on the Senate floor while the
resolution was read by Senator Chuck Hufstetler, who sponsored the
resolution. Nikita Patterson from Gordon State College, Denise
Huddleston from Metro RESA, Joy Darley from Georgia Southern, and
Brian Lack from Forsyth County accompanied me during the event.
Several other GCTM members were seated in the gallery and offered
their support. We had the privilege of having lunch and speaking
with several members of the Finance Committee. I would like to
express my appreciation to T. J. Kaplan and Denise Huddleston for
their hard work in coordinating Math Day at the Capitol and setting
up the opportunity for us to meet with the Senators to express our
goals and concerns. I would also like to thank all of the members
who took time from their busy schedules to represent GCTM.
Finally, as Spring Break is upon
us, I’d like to recommend the movie Hidden Figures as a
“must-see” movie for all math educators and students. This
inspirational movie emphasizes the importance of students
understanding and being able to apply mathematics to
problem-solving. Your opportunities are unlimited if you have a
strong foundation in math. The movie also stresses the importance of
equity among all learners by focusing attention on the contributions
of these female mathematicians to The Space Race and other missions.
“Hidden Figures” has been regarded as relevant to the cause
of improving youth awareness in education and careers in the
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) field. It
was designed to help encourage a new generation of women to consider
STEM careers. Research indicates that by the year 2020, there will
be 2.4-million unfilled STEM jobs. The challenge for Georgia’s math
educators is to find ways to use the lessons learned from this
historical event to springboard today’s classroom instruction and
encourage our students to problem-solve and be inspired by
mathematics. That being said, I hope each of you enjoy a fun,
relaxing Spring Break and has a strong finish to this school year.
Back to Top
Advocacy
by Denise Huddlestun,
VP for Advocacy |
School
Visit
Rep. Beth Beskin, a member of the House Education Committee, visited
Fickett Elementary School in the Atlanta Public School System on
Thursday, Oct. 13. She visited a 2nd, 3rd, and 5th grade classroom
accompanied by the math coach at the school, the district elementary
math coordinator, TJ, and Denise. In each of the classrooms she
engaged with students and asked them questions about what they were
doing and was impressed with what the students were doing as well as
how they could explain what they were doing. In the 3rd grade
classroom she saw students working in different centers and observed
how the students working in the small group with the teacher were
making sense of problems, representing the problems with
manipulatives, and determining the solution.
State Board Member visit to GMC
Brian Burdette, the State Board of Education member from the 10th
congressional district, attended the Thursday evening session at the
GMC and heard Jenny Bay-Williams. Prior to the meeting, several
members had the opportunity to talk with him about the need for
rigorous standards for students.
Lunch with the Lieutenant Governor
I was invited to have lunch with Lieutenant Casey Cagle. Jeremy
Peacock, President of GSTA and I were the only educators in the
room. Other agencies/interests represented were the Hotel
Association, transportation, Piedmont Hospital, Medicare/Medicaid,
vendor for rehabilitation facilities, DeVita Dialysis, energy
(Southern Company, Oconee Energy) and a few others. Each shared
their interest. I shared the continued support of the GSE, a
rigorous curriculum appropriate for all students.
Math Day at the Capitol
The resolution was written and declared Monday, February 13 as Math
Day at the Capitol. The Senate Finance Committee (15 members) were
invited, and I asked if the Chairman of the Senate and House
Education Committees could be invited as well. There were about five
GCTM members who attended the luncheon and chat with the senators.
Below is the Math Day is highlighted in Michael William’s Capitol
update.
“This past Wednesday, we had the privilege of
recognizing the Georgia Council of Teachers of Mathematics for their
work promoting mathematics education as part of Math Day at the
Capitol. Math and all STEM education are vital because they
influence every part of our lives.”
MICHAEL WILLIAMS
GEORGIA STATE SENATOR - DISTRICT 27
MAJORITY DEPUTY WHIP
WWW.SUPPORTWILLIAMS.COM;
michael.williams@senate.ga.gov
COMMITTEES: Appropriations Subcommittee on Fiscal Management
and General Government (Chair), Banking and Financial Institutions
(Secretary), Financial and Public Safety, Ethics, and Appropriations
Committees.
Back to Top
The 2017 GCTM Elections Are Upon Us!

Online voting instructions and
unique ballot codes will be emailed* to members very soon (by April
15th). Online voting begins a day or two later, with the last day to
vote being April 29th. In the meantime, become familiar with the
candidates running for President, Vice President for Awards and
Honors, Vice President for Advocacy, and Secretary by following the
links below:
*Members with no email address
listed in our database will be sent a paper ballot via US Mail
Back to Top

Well, Georgia mathematics
teachers—spring break is upon us and another year is almost over. We
know that students tend to check out on us after spring break. How
can we keep them “checked in”? In this article, I will share three
student engagement strategies that might help you make it to the end
of the school year with some level of sanity! Even students who are
good at sitting still, listening, and taking notes are antsy this
time of year! They need movement and something interesting to figure
out. My 13-year old son said that the problem with math is that the
teachers always want to tell him how to solve problems, but he wants
to figure out how to solve them himself. My 9-year old, who is very
rigid, thinks that he’s only allowed to think about and do problems
using the method his teachers have taught him. I know you have
students like both of my boys. Working challenging problems that
lend themselves to multiple strategies in small groups is a great
way to engage students. The three strategies shared below assume
this kind of task and structure.
Strategy
1: Discourse and Talk Moves
Discourse is a hot topic right
now in mathematics education. In fact, it’s the theme of this year’s
Georgia Math Conference! Thinking about your own classroom on a
typical day, who does most of the talking? Is it the teacher? Is it
students? What kind of talking is going on? Is it an IRE
(Initiation, response, evaluation) pattern of discourse (Moschkovich,
2007)? In this pattern, teachers initiate a question and one or more
student(s) respond. Finally, the teacher evaluates the answer(s) as
correct or incorrect . This discourse pattern can also be
characterized as vertical discourse
(teacher-student-teacher-student…). A more engaging pattern is
horizontal discourse (Nathan & Knuth, 2003) in which there is
student-to-student discourse. There are some “Talk Moves” (Kazemi &
Hintz, 2014) that a teacher that can use to promote classroom
discourse.
Talk Moves to Support Classroom Discussion (Kazemi
& Hintz, 2014) |
Revoicing: “So
you’re saying”—
- Repeat some or all of what the
student has said, then ask the student to respond and
verify whether or not the revoicing is correct.
Revoicing can be used to clarify, amplify, or highlight
an idea.
|
Repeating: Can
you repeat what she said in your own words?—
- Ask a student to repeat or
rephrase what another student said. Restate important
parts of complex idea in order to slow the conversation
down and dwell on important ideas.
|
Reasoning:
“Do you agree or disagree, and why?” “Why does that make
sense?
- After students have had time to
process a classmate’s claim, ask students to compare
their own reasoning to someone else’s reasoning.
- Allow students to engage with
each other’s ideas.
- Student: “I respectfully disagree
with that idea because…”; “This idea makes sense to me
because…”
|
Adding On:
“Would someone like to add on to this?”
- Prompt students, inviting them to
participate in the conversation or to clarify their own
thinking.
- Student: “I’d like to add on…”
|
Wait time:
“Take your time…”
- Wait after asking a question
before calling on a student.
- Wait after a student has been
called on to give the student time to organize his or
her thoughts.
- Student: “I’d like some more
time.”
|
Turn-and-Talk:
“Turn and talk to your neighbor…”
- Circulate and listen to partner
talk. Use this information to choose whom to call on.
- Allow students to clarify and
share ideas.
- Allow students to orient
themselves to each other’s thinking.
|
Revise: “Has
anyone’s thinking changed?” “Would you like to revise your
thinking?”
- Allow students to revise their
thinking as they have new insights.
- Student: I thought….But now I
think… because…. I’d like to revise my thinking.
|
|
These Talk Moves can help you get
students talking about mathematics. Some of them, such as wait time,
are likely familiar, but you might try some of them that are not
already part of your regular practice.
Strategy 2: Technology
Technology
has come a long way! There are so many apps and open-resource
materials that you can access easily and without cost. My favorites
are Geogebra and Desmos. Did you know
Desmos has a
new feature called Desmos Teacher? You can pull up all your
students’ screens on your computer and see what they are working on.
And if you don’t have graphing calculators—not a problem. Desmos has
an app and students can use it right on their phones.
Geogebra has
tons of shared investigations that other teachers have designed. If
you don’t know how to use the software yourself, you can find things
other teachers have created and students can investigate mathematics
by clicking and dragging (and, of course, they are ALL experts at
that!) objects to notice patterns and relationships.

Like Desmos, Geogebra is free,
and is available as a phone app as well. There are also many
websites that provide exciting problems and activities for you to
use. I really like engageny (engage New York) at
https://www.engageny.org. They have resources for all grade
levels.

Another great site is the Math
Assessment Project at
http://map.mathshell.org/lessons.ph. They have full
investigations tied to standards for grades 6-12, with all of the
student materials already created. Another nice trick is that our
GSE standards have the similar codes as Common Core standards. For
example, the GSE standard MGSE9-12.G.GMD.1 matches the Common Core
Standard CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.HSG.GMD.A.1. If you find the Common Core
standard code, you can search by code to find many online resources
for any GSE Standard.

And if you don’t know about Dan
Meyers’ 3-Act tasks, check him out at
http://blog.mrmeyer.com/category/3acts/. My younger son (4th
grade) loves to use the Hands-on-Equations app. He’s solving 2-step
linear equations in 4th grade! Kids always amaze me with what they
can do.
Strategy 3: Open-ended
questions
Open-ended questions are a great
way to engage students in a different kind of thinking other than
what they are used to using. One of my favorite types of open-ended
questions is asking a question backwards (kind of like Jeopardy—you
give the answer and let students come up with the question). In 8th
grade, students are studying systems of linear equations. My older
son is in 8th grade, and I asked him to write me a system of linear
equations that has a solution of (2,3). He struggled at first, but
he figured it out. He was very proficient at using the methods, but
this question stumped him a bit. You could give students a graph of
a function with no numbers on the axes and ask them to write an
equation that would produce such a graph, or a story that would fit
the graph. In the early grades, you could ask them to write a story
problem that would match an equation like 10 – 4 = 6. In geometry,
you could ask students to come up with the dimensions of two
different cylinders that have the same volume. These questions are
often at a higher level of cognitive demand because the students
don’t have a step-by-step procedure to solve them. Give them a try!
We at GCTM wish you a wonderful
and relaxing spring break—we know you deserve it! I hope you will
find some of these ideas helpful as you prepare yourself for the
home stretch. Thank you for all you do for children in mathematics
classrooms across Georgia!
References
Kazemi, E. & Hintz, A. (2014).
Intentional talk: How to structure and lead productive mathematical
discussions. Portland, MA: Stenhouse.
Moschkovich, J. (2007). Examining
mathematical discourse practices. For the Learning of Mathematics,
27 (1), 24-30.
Nathan, M. J. & Knuth, E. J.
(2003). A study of whole classroom mathematical discourse and
teacher change. Cognition and Instruction, 21 (2), 175-207.
Wendy Sanchez is a
mathematics teacher educator at Kennesaw State University. She
teaches undergraduate and graduate content and methods courses for
preservice and inservice mathematics teachers. Her research is
related to mathematics methods courses for preservice teachers.
Back to Top

Teacher
Talk is a new section for Reflections. This section will be used to
showcase the perspectives of teachers in the informal setting of an
interview. This Teacher Talk showcases the experiences of Diana
Lossner, a retired mathematics teacher from Cobb County and a
part-time lecturer at Kennesaw State University. In this interview,
she discusses her struggles with learning how to teach mathematics
nearly four decades ago, and imparts some advice for those who
continue to teach mathematics today.
Becky: When did you start
teaching mathematics?
Diana: I started teaching
math in 1970 in Knox County, Tennessee. I taught 7th and 8th grade
math in an elementary school. In Tennessee at that time, it was K-8
and 9-12. I had six classes a day. Students were tracked. Twelve
students were in my low-level classes and around 25 were in my
on-level and advanced classes. I taught three years, took a three
year break, and then taught another 33 years straight. I taught four
years in three different private schools and the rest public
[schools].
Becky: What resources did
you find most helpful when you first started teaching?
Diana:
We were given the textbook, told to start on page 1 and get as far
as you could. I had no other math teachers at my disposal. I made up
all my own worksheets and tests. The biggest challenge was that I
had to teach my low level kids to add, subtract, multiply and
divide. I had no background in that so I made up my own
manipulatives and hoped that was right. It seemed to work okay. The
math I taught was much harder than now. My 7th grades learned base 5
arithmetic. Teaching that showed me that the kids really know the
base 10 system, so I went back and showed them that. My unofficial
mentor was an English teacher. Her favorite saying was "The kids
will learn in spite of us." Our principal wanted to try different
approaches to teaching but never fully understood how to implement
any of them. I had no resources except teacher's edition of
textbook.
Becky: When you went from
one school to another, did you have a difficult time adapting to the
new school culture or going from private to public? What challenges
did you face?
Diana:
Each change was so different that it was like starting over. But
they all had one thing in common - no resources. I started working
with my first real mentor…when I taught Physics at Baylor School for
Boys (now coed). My department head helped me tremendously. I really
had no help until I came to Cobb County in 1984. I was in a
department of fifteen at Walton High School. We worked together just
like they do today. (Walton teaches "lock step" with all teachers
teaching the same thing on the same day with the same test and a
lead teacher in charge. They formed professional learning
communities before they were called PLCs. I know a lot of schools
still have them, but it doesn't seem mandatory now.) The biggest
challenge was always a lack of material. I relied totally on the
textbook.
Becky: What was your
favorite subject to teach and why?
Diana: My favorite class
to teach was Analysis. Our department head at Pope, Cherlyn Sheperd,
left and said, “Here it is, but there's a chapter zero that we teach
also.” She and Debbie Poss had developed the curriculum, and it had
set theory with rings and fields that I knew nothing about. It was
an interesting summer, but I loved the class and learned a lot. I
taught it for about 10 years and actually incorporated some of those
topics in Accelerated Math 3. This class was all over the map and
showed the real beauty of math. It also allowed me to stretch the
kids. I gave them topics that were not in the curriculum and had
them research and present them to the class.
Becky:
As you look back on your career, what stands out the most, and what
words of wisdom do you have to share with our readers.
Diana: The school may
assign you a mentor. Use him or her. Also find an unofficial mentor
that has your values and hopefully teaches what you teach.
Collaborate, collaborate, collaborate!!! I loved being on the
cutting edge of technology. Students learn much better visually
(mostly anyway) and I loved the graphing calculators and the
programs on computers that show the students what the algebra really
means. I know we have had a lot of complaints about the "new math",
but what I see coming through the elementary schools now is
fantastic!! We are teaching the real meaning of the math and then
showing them the algorithms. That's the way it should be done. If
they see that with numbers I think they will have a better handle on
algebra. Now I want to finish my other thought about mentors. Always
find the most positive people around. There is nothing that will
bring you down faster than a negative person. Unfortunately they are
in every school. Use the internet. There are so many sites that can
give a different approach that may help you present the topic
better. But once again remember there are sites that aren't that
good.
Becky: I appreciate you
taking your evening to answer some of these questions and sharing
your insights on teaching mathematics. Thank you!
Conclusion
Who would you like us to
interview for the next Teacher Talk? A coworker? An author of your
favorite mathematical article? A special presenter from GMC?
Email us with your
request, and we will be happy to reach out to them. Be sure to sure
to include any questions that you want us to ask during the next
interview. Thank you for being part of Reflections.
Back to Top
Before
you know it, it will be that special time of the year when
mathematics teachers from across the state come together to learn,
discuss, and be inspired about teaching mathematics. The 2017
Georgia Mathematics Conference at Rock Eagle will be filled with
engaging sessions and insightful keynote speakers, so please save
the dates of October 18th through 20th. This year’s theme will be
“Communicating Mathematics: Creating a Culture of Discourse
Fluency.”

The keynote speakers will include
Sunil Singh, Chris Franklin, and Sue O’Donnell.
 |
Sunil Singh is the author of
Pi of Life: The Hidden Happiness of Mathematics and a Lead
Ambassador of The Global Math Project. He is also a Regular
Contributor to the New York Times Numberplay Blog and spends
much of his time doing Family Math Nights all over his home
province of Ontario. Currently, he works with Scolab (a
partner with The Global Math Project) as a math consultant
to the development and promotion of interactive and
integrative digital resources for K to 12 schools in the US
and Canada. He has given over 50 presentations and workshops
on creative mathematics to principals, teachers and students
in Ontario. |
 |
Christine (Chris) Franklin is
the K-12 Statistics Ambassador for the American Statistical
Association and elected Fellow. She is retired from the
University of Georgia after 36 years as the Lothar Tresp
Honoratus Honors Professor and Senior Lecturer Emeritus in
Statistics. She is the co-author of two Introductory
Statistics textbooks and has published more than 50 journal
articles and book chapters. Chris was the lead writer for
the American Statistical Association Pre-K-12 Guidelines for
the Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE)
Framework and chaired the writing team of the ASA
Statistical Education of Teachers (SET) report. Chris
completed her term serving as the Advanced Placement
Statistics Chief Reader in July 2009. She has been honored
nationally by her peers with the Mu Sigma Rho National
Statistical Education Award, the United States Conference on
Teaching Statistics (USCOTS) biennial lifetime achievement
award, and the ASA prestigious Founders Award. She was a
2014-15 Fulbright Scholar, spending six months at the
University of Auckland, New Zealand working with statistics
educators on the project, “Implementing K-12 Statistics
Standards: Comparing Practices in New Zealand and the United
States”. She also spent time with mathematics and statistics
educators at the University of Tasmania. |
 |
Sue O’Connell has years of
experience as an elementary classroom teacher, math coach,
district school improvement specialist, and math
speaker/consultant. She is the lead author for Heinemann’s
Math in Practice series and is the coauthor of Putting the
Practices Into Action, Mastering the Basic Math Facts in
Addition and Subtraction, and Mastering the Basic Math Facts
in Multiplication and Division. She has authored numerous
other books that support the teaching of K-5 mathematics and
is particularly focused on instructional practices that
support the development of mathematical thinking. She is a
frequent speaker at math conferences and is Director of
Quality Teacher Development, providing on-site professional
development for schools and school districts across the
country. |
Would you like to be part of this
wonderful conference? Consider using your expertise and present your
own ideas in a session! For more information, please visit this GMC
page located on GCMT’s website found at
https://new.gctm-resources.org/gctm/dv7/?q=gmc.
Back to Top

Email questions to
academies@gctm.org.
Cost: $120 for non-member and $90 for
member
Registration Opened February 14th
at
GCTM Summer Academies
Locations and Dates:
-
Albany High School in
Dougherty County—June 13th-14th
-
Statesboro High School in
Bulloch County—June 20th-21st
-
Allatoona High School in Cobb
County—June 27th-28th
-
Morgan County High School in
Morgan County—July 11th-12th
Don’t miss out on this wonderful
opportunity. Sign up today!
Back to Top

Middle School Math Tournament
Would you like to challenge your middle school students? Get
them excited about mathematics by encouraging them to compete in the
GCTM Middle School Math Tournament! The competition will be on
Saturday, April 22 at Thomson Middle School in Centerville. The
registration fee is $20 if the teacher is not a member of GCTM, and
only $10 for members. More information and a registration form can
be found on the Competitions
page of the GCTM website. Don’t forget to check out GCTM’s
Middle School Tournament text to help your students prepare for the
event. This book is filled with example problems and solutions to
surely get your math team talking and problem-solving.

State Math Tournament
The State Math Tournament are by invitation only, but registration
is free. This year’s State Math Tournament will be Saturday, April
29 at Middle State University in Macon. Competition materials from
1998 to present can be found a collection of three texts mentioned
below. The texts include problems that model the style, scope, and
topics found in the State Math Tournament! Check them out!

Full solutions, and sometimes
multiple solutions, are provided along with a topic index so that
students may find any problem by topic. (Note: All sale proceeds go
directly to GCTM and fund the State Math Tournament and ARML team.)
Back to Top

There are plenty of opportunities to receive funding for new
teaching endeavors. Check out the following grants and contact Peggy
Pool at awards@gctm.org.
Mini-Grants
The Mini-Grant program has been implemented to provide funding for
creative teaching projects. Proposals will be judged anonymously,
and grants will be awarded in any amount up to $300.00. Each winner
should be willing to either write an article for Reflections, the
GCTM publication, or participate on a panel with other Mini-Grant
winners at the following Georgia Math Conference. The criteria upon
which applications will be evaluated are:
-
Creativity, innovation
-
Potential impact upon student
achievement
-
Potential for replication by
and dissemination to other teachers
-
Advancement of NCTM's
Principles and Standards for School Mathematics
-
Unavailability of funding
from local sources
Special Projects
GCTM is now offering its members an opportunity to apply for funds
to support large projects that promote the improvement of
mathematics teaching in Georgia. These projects can be focused on
staff development activities, conferences, curriculum development,
task forces, research projects, or other initiatives with similar
impact.
Emerging Teacher-Leaders in Elementary School Mathematics Grants for
Grades PreK–5 Teachers
The purpose of these grants is to increase the breadth and depth of
the mathematics content knowledge of one elementary school teacher
who has a demonstrated commitment to mathematics teaching and
learning. The applicant must have the support of the school
principal in becoming a mathematics teacher-leader within her or his
school or district. For the 2013–2014 school year, grants with a
maximum of $6,000 each will be awarded. Only one teacher per school
may receive the award. The desired outcome of the funded project is
the development of an elementary school mathematics teacher with
mathematics content expertise.
Teacher Professional Development Grants for Grades PreK–5 Teachers
The purpose of these grants is to support professional development
to improve the competence in the teaching of mathematics of one or
more classroom teachers*. For 2013–2014, grants of a maximum of
$3,000 will be awarded to person(s) currently teaching at the grades
PreK–5 level. The proposal must delineate the professional
development plan and address how the proposed project will improve
the teacher(s)’ competence and affect students’ learning. Any
acquisition of equipment must support the proposed plan but not be
the primary focus of the grant. Recipients must have three or more
years of teaching experience in grades PreK–5. Proposals must
address the following: the professional development plan, how it
will enhance the applicant(s)’ mathematical knowledge, and its
anticipated impact on students’ learning. (*The definition of a
classroom teacher is an individual who spends half or more of
his/her work time teaching in the classroom.)
Improving Students’ Understanding of Geometry Grants for Grades
PreK–8 Teachers
The purpose of these grants is to develop activities that will
enable students to better appreciate and understand some aspect of
geometry that is consistent with the Principles and Standards for
School Mathematics of NCTM. For 2013–2014, grants with a maximum of
$4,000 each will be awarded to persons currently teaching at the
grades PreK–8 level. The project should include applications of
geometry to, for example, art, literature, music, architecture,
nature, or some other relevant area and may integrate the use of
technology into the teaching of geometry. The activities may use
published materials. Any published sources must be documented. Any
acquisition of equipment or payment of personal stipends must be
critical to the grant proposal and may not be a major portion of the
proposed budget. Proposals must address the following: geometry
content, the appropriateness of the application, the link between
the Geometry Standard and the project’s activities, and the
anticipated impact on students’ learning.
Summer Mathematics Study Grants for Grades 6-8
Teachers
The purpose of these grants is to provide financial support for
teachers seeking to improve their understanding of mathematics by
completing course work in mathematics content. For 2016–2017, grants
with a maximum of $6,000 each will be awarded to persons currently
teaching at the grades 6-8 level. Primary emphasis is placed on
enrollment and completion of appropriate courses on mathematics
content and the relevance of the course content to enhancing the
teaching of mathematics in Grades 6-8. Proposals must address the
following: rationale for the coursework, anticipated instructional
improvements, and the expected impact on student learning. The grant
will advance funds to cover tuition, and books. The balance of the
funds will be issued as a stipend upon receipt of an official
transcript that demonstrates completion of the proposed mathematics
course work with a grade of C or better.
Connecting Mathematics to Other Subject Areas Grants for Grades 9-12
Teachers
The purpose of this grant is to create senior high classroom
materials or lessons connecting mathematics to other fields. For
2016–2017, grants with a maximum of $4,000 each will be awarded to
persons currently teaching mathematics in grades 9–12. Materials may
be in the form of books, visual displays, computer programs or
displays, slide shows, videotapes, or other appropriate medium. The
focus of these materials should be on showing the connectivity of
mathematics to other fields or to the world around us. Any
acquisition of equipment or payment of personal stipends must be
critical to the grant proposal and may not be a major portion of the
proposed budget. Any published sources must be documented. Proposals
must address the following: the plan for developing and evaluating
materials, the connectivity to other fields or disciplines, and
anticipated impact on students’ learning.
Grants and other Funding Opportunities compiled
by Texas Instruments
Texas Instruments has collected a freely-available, and very long
list of federal and private funding opportunities in math, science,
and technology for grades K-12 and higher ed; teacher professional
development; and university-level research and fellowship programs.
They also offer guidelines and tips that will help you become a
grant writing expert. The grant information is updated quarterly, so
interested individuals may want to check their site frequently.
ING Unsung Heroes Grants
The ING Unsung Heroes awards program annually recognizes K-12
educators in the United States for their innovative teaching
methods, creative educational projects, and ability to positively
influence the children they teach. Educators are invited to submit
grant applications describing class projects they have initiated or
would like to pursue. Each year, one hundred educators are selected
to receive awards of $$2,000 each to help fund their projects. At
least one award will be granted in each of the fifty United States,
provided one or more qualified applications are received from each
state. Of the hundred finalists, three will be selected for
additional financial awards. First place will receive $$25,000;
second place will receive $$10,000; and the third-place winner will
receive $$5,000. All awards must be used to further the projects
within the school or school system. All K-12 education professionals
are eligible to apply. Applicants must be employed by an accredited
K-12 public or private school located in the U.S. and be a full-time
educator, teacher, principal, paraprofessional, or classified staff
member working on a project with demonstrated effectiveness in
improving student learning. Previous recipients of ING Unsung Heroes
awards are not eligible to apply for another award.
Advanced Technological Education (ATE)
With an emphasis on two-year colleges, the Advanced Technological
Education (ATE) program focuses on the education of technicians for
the high-technology fields that drive our nation's economy. The
program involves partnerships between academic institutions and
employers to promote improvement in the education of science and
engineering technicians at the undergraduate and secondary school
levels. The ATE program supports curriculum development;
professional development of college faculty and secondary school
teachers; career pathways to two-year colleges from secondary
schools and from two-year colleges to four-year institutions; and
other activities. Another goal is articulation between two-year and
four-year programs for K-12 prospective teachers that focus on
technological education. The program also invites proposals focusing
on research to advance the knowledge base related to technician
education.
The Toshiba American Foundation (TAF)
Toshiba America Foundation (TAF) grants fund the projects ideas and
materials teachers need to innovate in their math and science
classrooms. TAF is interested in funding projects designed by
teachers or small teams of teachers for use in their own schools.
Toshiba America Foundation believes science and mathematics are
exciting fields in which all students can succeed with the proper
tools and instruction. They offer grants up to $$1,000 to K-5
teachers with Application due on October 1st each year, and grants
up to and beyond $$5,000 for teachers of grades 6-12. Grade 6-12
applications for $$5,000 or less are accepted on a rolling basis,
throughout the calendar year. Grants requests of more than $$5,000
are reviewed twice a year. Applications for grants of more
than $$5,000 are due August 1st and February 1st each year.
Back to Top

Do
you have something to share with other mathematics teachers or
mathematics teacher educators? Do you have a favorite mathematical
lesson that invites your students to dive into mathematics? Have you
discovered a new technology tool that you cannot wait to share with
your colleagues? If so, please consider submitting your manuscript
to Reflections, a publication of the Georgia Council of Teachers of
Mathematics. How do you dive deeper into problem-solving,
collaboration, mathematics, or instructional practices?
The next four issues of
Reflections will focus on the following priority topics:
-
Technologies for teaching and
learning mathematics
-
Activities for teaching
mathematics (hands-on and/or collaborative)
-
Statistics for each grade
level and beyond
-
Mathematical proofs
-
Differentiated Instruction
-
Assessments
-
Favorite “ah-ha” lessons
-
Teacher Talk – Interview
Style
-
Student mathematical art-work
As Georgia’s leading platform for
the exchange of ideas among mathematics educators, contributors vary
in subject areas, levels of expertise, and target audiences.
Additionally, we welcome first-time contributors, writing
collaborators, mathematicians, new and preservice teachers, and
retired teachers and professors. One of the perks for submitting an
article is that your membership fee for GCTM will be waived for one
year. How great is that? If you wish to discuss your ideas for a
topic prior to submission, please contact Dr. Becky Gammill
at gammillgctm@gmail.com.
Guidelines for Submissions
-
Manuscript Format: Manuscripts
are blind reviewed by members of the editorial review board. For
this reason, each manuscript should include a cover sheet
containing: title of manuscript, author’s name, position and
email address. Identifying information should not appear
elsewhere in the manuscript in order to ensure an impartial
review. Manuscripts should be double-spaced, with 1-inch margins
on all sides, typed in 12-point font and follow the APA 6th
Edition style guide. Manuscripts should be submitted in MS Word.
If you have a picture or graphic in the text, please include the
original picture(s) in a separate file.
-
Manuscript Submission: Manuscripts
should be submitted to Rebecca Gammill
(gammillgctm@gmail.com).
Receipt of manuscripts will be acknowledged. Manuscripts are
accepted for consideration with the understanding that they have
not been published previously and are not being considered
simultaneously for publication elsewhere.
-
Manuscript Publication: When
a manuscript is accepted for publication, the editor/journal
reviewers may make suggestions or revisions in consultation with
the principal author. However, because of publication deadlines
the editor reserves the right to make minor revisions without
seeking prior approval from the author. Release statements for
all copyrighted materials must be received prior to publication.
Back to Top

Below I am sharing an important article of the history and swinging
pendulum of the different foci of the approach to teaching
mathematics since 1788 to today! Matt Larson, President of NCTM,
shares this history and some advice for coping with changes and
challenges in mathematics teaching and learning in most all
educational settings and times.
For more excellent articles and perspectives from the Matt Larson,
check out the following website:
http://www.nctm.org/News-and-Calendar/Messages-from-the-President/
Matt
Larson, NCTM President
February 20, 2017
The Elusive Search for Balance
In a recent President’s blog post on the
need to make homework comprehensible, I referred to the Fordham
Institute Report, Common Core Math in the K–8 Classroom: Results
from a National Survey. The report offers another interesting
finding: “The math wars aren’t over.”
The authors of the report observe, “The Common
Core math standards seek to bring a peaceful end to the ‘math wars’
of recent years by requiring equal attention to conceptual
understanding, procedural fluency, and application (applying math to
real-world problems). Yet striking that balance has not been easy.
We see in these results several examples of teachers over- or
underemphasizing one component to the detriment of another” (p. 6).
I found this statement particularly striking.
This over- or underemphasis may be less a function of independent
teacher actions in the classroom than a result of teachers doing
their best to interpret and implement what they find in their
curricular materials, which, as the Fordham report indicates, are
aligned (or not) with the Common Core State Standards to varying
degrees. The over- or underemphasis of a particular component may
also reflect teachers’ trying hard to comply with mandates at the
district or school level.
It is critical to appreciate that the over- or
underemphasis phenomenon is not a new one. Mathematics teachers in
the United States today are just the latest generation of U.S.
educators to be caught in a 200 plus–year pendulum swing between an
overemphasis of rote practice of isolated skills and procedures and
an overemphasis of conceptual understanding, with their respective
overreliance on either teacher-directed or student-centered
instruction.
It all began in 1788 (the same year that the U.S.
Constitution was ratified), when Nicolas Pike published the first
major U.S. mathematics textbook, entitled Arithmetic. The
process that Pike recommended for teachers was to state a rule,
provide an example, and then have students complete a series of
practice exercises very similar to the example. If that teaching
process sounds familiar, it is probably because that was the way you
experienced math instruction as a student yourself. This process
became the U.S. script for teaching mathematics and is deeply
embedded in our culture—expected by the vast majority of students
and parents alike.
In the 1820s the pendulum swung for the first
time when Warren Colburn published a series of texts, including
Colburn’s First Lessons: Intellectual Arithmetic, Upon the Inductive
Method (1826). Colburn recommended that teachers use a series of
carefully sequenced questions and concrete materials so that
students could discover mathematical rules for themselves. By the
1830s the pendulum was swinging back with the publication of the
Southern and Western Calculator (1831) and The Common School
Arithmetic (1832), which once again emphasized direct
instruction of rules and procedures, taught the “good old fashioned
way.”
The late 1950s and 1960s were the era of “New
Math.” Proponents of new math worked to make the pendulum swing from
rote learning to discovery teaching approaches that emphasized
developing students’ understanding of the structure of mathematics,
how mathematical ideas fit together, and the reasoning (or habits of
mind) of mathematicians. The 1970s and 1980s saw the pendulum swing
in the opposite direction yet again as these two decades became
known as the “back to the basics” era, with a focus again on
procedural skills and direct instruction.
In 1989 NCTM gave birth to the standards-based
education reform effort with the release of
Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics,
and subsequently NCTM followed up this transformative publication
with a series of other standards publications, culminating in
Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (2000). By
the mid-1990s over 40 states had created state math standards or
curriculum frameworks consistent with the NCTM standards. But by the
late 1990s the pendulum began to swing back to the basics when the
“math wars” erupted in California and then spread across the country
as parents and others demanded a renewed emphasis on procedural
skills and direct instruction.
And that brings us to the latest perceived
pendulum swing: the Common Core State Standards and the associated
myriad of misinformation and misinterpretations surrounding them, as
well as the historic and seemingly inevitable pushback that now
benefits from and is fueled by social media. So what should a
mathematics teacher caught up in these historic and continual
pendulum swings do? My advice: Seek balance.
In many ways it seems as though we live in a
world that is out of balance—pushed to extremes—that has “lost the
middle” in various ways. To move mathematics teaching and learning
forward, we have to resist the urge to be pushed to extremes. We
have to do our part to break the historic cycle of pendulum swings.
As Hung-Hsi Wu, professor emeritus of mathematics at the University
of California–Berkeley, wrote nearly two decades ago, “Let us teach
our children mathematics the honest way by teaching both skills and
understanding.” This is essentially what the Common Core authors
argue when they state, “[M]athematical understanding and procedural
skill are equally important” (National Governors Association and
Council of Chief State School Officers 2010, p. 4).
Over a decade ago the National Research Council
(NCR) published Adding It Up (2001), which promoted a
multifaceted and interwoven definition of mathematical literacy:
Procedural fluency and conceptual
understanding are often seen as competing for attention in school
mathematics. But pitting skill against understanding creates a false
dichotomy … Understanding makes learning skills easier, less
susceptible to common errors, and less prone to forgetting. By the
same token, a certain level of skill is required to learn many
mathematical concepts with understanding, and using procedures can
help strengthen and develop that understanding. (p. 122).
We need to return to, promote, and implement in
our classrooms the NRC definition of mathematical literacy. The goal
of mathematics education is not complicated. We want students to
know how to solve problems (procedures), know why
procedures work (conceptual understanding), and know when to
use mathematics (problem solving and application) while building a
positive mathematics identity and sense of agency. How? Why? And
when? These questions are the very essence of rigor in the Common
Core. We can ask ourselves simple reflective questions at the end of
each lesson and over the course of a unit:
-
Are my students learning how
to solve a problem (or problems)?
-
Are my students developing an
understanding of why certain solution strategies work?
-
Are my students learning when
and where they might apply particular solution strategies?
-
Did the experiences in my
class help my students see themselves as capable doers and users
of mathematics?
If the answer to all four questions is yes, that
is more than likely a good sign. If we stay focused on all four
learning goals, and resist (or dodge) the pendulum swings in any one
direction while steadily building students’ positive mathematics
identity, perhaps the constant criticism that moves the pendulum
will stop. When we stay the course and let students engage, learn,
and develop their understanding, skills, and abilities to use
mathematics, our students will be the beneficiaries of our efforts
to find and maintain that balance.
Back to Top
Spread
the Good News of GCTM Membership
I have been working on my Lenten resolution. I
took a nudge from a Facebook post and am doing a bag-a-day purge. It
means I use time I might waste on other things to fill a bag to go
to recycling, a charity or even the trash. The bags are things that
I can remove from my life to share with the needy or to clear the
clutter that complicates my life and allow me to focus on helping
others. As teachers, I think you can relate to the idea of clutter.
Even if organized, our materials accumulate.

There is one thing I would never remove though,
and that is my GCTM and NCTM memberships. They have been the
cornerstone of my career and have never been a sacrifice in any way.
Rather they have enriched my life and teaching in more ways than I
can list.
As members, reflect on the good aspects of your
GCTM membership. Has it been worth the cost of a couple of movies, a
meal out, a magazine subscription per year? $20 is all it takes to
be and remain an active GCTM member.
So when your membership comes up for renewal,
please don’t hesitate to renew. And while you are at it, encourage a
new teacher to join, or even a veteran colleague. Each year at the
conference, I am amazed that teachers approach me to say that they
have been teaching over 20 years and had never heard of GCTM. These
teachers are saddened by they and their students had missed over
those years. As members, we have to be our own advocates. Spread the
good news! Let’s fill our membership roles with as many teachers as
possible to bring our numbers to the levels we have had in the past!
We are counting on you!
Please visit your membership page on the website
and volunteer for GCTM projects and update a new entry regarding
your NCTM membership!
Back to Top
President –
Bonnie Angel
Past President –
Kaycie Maddox
Treasurer
– Nickey Ice
Executive Director –
Tom Ottinger
Membership Director –
Susan Craig
NCTM Representative –
Dottie Whitlow
Secretary –
Michelle Mikes
IT Director –
Paul Oser
REFLECTIONS Editor –
Becky Gammill
VP for Advocacy –
Denise Huddlestun
VP for Constitution and
Policy – Joy Darley
VP for Honors and Awards –
Peggy Pool
VP for Regional Services
– Kristi Caissie
VP for Competitions –
Chuck Garner
Conference Board Chair –
Tammy Donalson
|
Back to Top |
Table of Contents
President's Message - by Bonnie
Angel, GCTM President
Advocacy - by
Denise Huddlestun, VP for Advocacy
2017
GCTM's Elections
End-of-the-Year Student Engagement Strategies by Wendy Sanchez,
Professor of Mathematics Education, Kennesaw State University
Teacher Talk
by Becky Gammill, Publication Editor
GMC Update by
David Thacker, GMC Program Chair
2017 GCTM Summer Math
Academies by Kristie Caissie, VP Regional Services
Competitions Update by Chuck Garner, VP Competitions
Funding
Opportunities by Peggy Pool, VP Honors and Awards
Call for
Manuscripts by Becky Gammill, Ed.D., Publications Editor
NCTM Report
by Dottie Whitlow, NCTM Representative
GCTM
Membership Report - by Susan Craig Membership Director
GCTM Executive Board
|