This graphic was created by Editor Cheryl Hughes using THINGLINK.com, a convenient tool to combine many media on
one topic. Check out all the links as you mouse over the
image.
As
the school year draws to a close, anticipation of summer events is a
welcome diversion to the often tedious tasks here at the end.
Keeping students engaged in learning and cleaning up classrooms can
be taxing to say the least. Once the summer break has finally begun,
though, this summer offers opportunities to polish the art of
teaching in your classroom for next year. Of course, you’ll need to
relax, spend time with family, and sleep late, if possible, but you
might consider the following suggestions that can have a big impact
on your teaching practice for August 2015:
Spend some time reflecting on the 2014-2015 school year.
Write down what went well and how you can enlarge those practices in
other areas of instruction. Talk with a colleague or knowledgeable
friend about these jewels of practice, explaining the pros and cons
of them to find ways to refine them further. With equal focus, write
what didn’t go well, using the same cycle of discussion and
refinement to determine ways to improve for next year. In essence,
use trusted colleagues and friends to serve as your personal
trainers for feedback. Just like any professional, from Tiger Woods
to Josh Groban to Reese Witherspoon, everyone needs the chance to
reflect and refine their abilities and talents.
Attend a GCTM Summer Academy (Grades K-8) or a DOE Summer
Professional Learning Institute (for Middle or High School).
These two professional learning opportunities offer teachers the
chance to work with other teachers to explore the revisions to the
Georgia Standards for Excellence with exemplary resources developed
specifically for them.
This is the link to the registration for the GCTM Summer Academies
and for the
DOE Summer Professional Learning Institute.
Read a good book. As a classroom teacher, I often found the
only time I could devote to reading would occur during the summer
break. May I suggest two books that particularly provide the
opportunity to grow in your teaching philosophy? The first is
Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning
by John Hattie which “synthesizes the results of more than
fifteen years research involving millions of students and
represented the biggest ever collection of evidence-based research
into what actually works in schools to improve learning.”1
The second is Mindset: The New Psychology of Success
by Carol Dweck. In this book, “Dweck explains why it’s not just our
abilities and talent that bring us success–but whether we approach
them with a fixed or growth mindset. She makes clear why praising
intelligence and ability doesn’t foster self-esteem and lead to
accomplishment, but may actually jeopardize success.”2
Determine to add one new strategy into your instructional
practice next year. After the personal reflection, professional
learning, and specialized reading suggested already, most likely you
will find many new ideas that could be incorporated into your
teaching. Focus on the integration of one new strategy until you and
your students feel comfortable with it. It takes time to make new
approaches feel automatic, so persevere when the first failures
occur. Then, add another strategy while maintaining the quality of
the first. It’s very difficult to do several new things well without
being overwhelmed and giving up before really starting. And give
yourself some grace, knowing, as you incorporate evidence-based
strategies into your teaching practice, you are growing as a
professional and providing strong learning opportunities for your
students. Have a restful and rejuvenating summer!
1Visible Learning: Maximizing the Impact of Learning,
Hattie, John, Routledge, London and New York 2Mindset:
The New Psychology of Success, Dweck, Carol, Ballantine Books,
New York
Back to Top
Contrary
to how that title might sound, I am not retiring from teaching, only
handing the job of Editor of this journal to another.
As I look back over the editions we have published,
both paper and online, I am so thankful for those of you who have
written articles, sent pictures, written copy for an ad, and sent
suggestions as to how to make our journal better.
It is time to give this job to someone with new
ideas, so I hope you will support our new editor, Dr. Becky Gammill,
and help her adjust to her new role.
As to my future, I have new things to learn, new
heights to climb, and new tasks to accomplish. For as long as I
live, my plan is to use my ever-increasing knowledge to be a better
person and a better teacher. My inspiration comes from my family, my
friends and my students who have taught me the important things in
life.
The first is that people matter. Every student
matters; every colleague matters, and even every parent matters. We
must treat them each with respect, because they matter.
The second important thing is to never stop learning
– never stop wanting to know and do new things. As the salutatorian
of our senior class said in his speech yesterday, “Remain curious as
a child. Keep that child-like curiosity.” There is so much that we
have yet to discover, and that is something we should instill in our
students – the awe of learning new things.
In the words of Edwin A. Abbott in the book
FLATLAND, “. . . to be self-contented is to be vile and
ignorant. To aspire is better than to be blindly and impotently
happy.”
Back to Top
The 39th annual GCTM State Math Tournament was held
at Middle Georgia State College in Macon, Georgia on April 25, 2015.
Schools are invited to the state tournament based on their
performance on previous Georgia tournaments throughout the 2014-2015
school year. Thirty-four invited schools attended this year’s state
tournament. Four students are selected to represent each school.
Twenty individuals were also invited to try-out for the state-wide
Georgia ARML team, making a total of 154 participants.
The tournament consisted of a very challenging
written test of 45 multiple-choice questions and 5 free-response
questions with a 90-minute time limit; 10 individual ciphering
problems, each problem with a two-minute time limit; and a team
round. The team round consisted of 12 problems for each team to
solve while working together within eighteen minutes.
The student with the best improvement at the state
tournament over the previous year was given the Steve Sigur Award
for Most Improved Performance. This award, named in honor of the
great mathematician, teacher, and mentor Steve Sigur, went to Tony
Zeng of Brookwood High School. Each participant and their school
sponsor was given a 2015 State Tournament T-shirt.
The top five teams and the top fifteen individuals
are listed below.
TOP TEAMS:
-
Northview High School
-
Gwinnett School of Math Science and Technology
-
Wheeler High School
-
Chamblee Charter High School
-
Kennesaw Mountain High School
TOP INDIVIDUALS:
-
Henrik Boecken,
Wheeler High School
-
Daniel Chu,
Kennesaw Mountain High School
-
Parth Kumar,
Cambridge High School
-
Alana Homa,
Chamblee Charter High School
-
Timothy Gieseking,
Gwinnett School of Math
Science and Technology
-
Rickie Jiang,
Northview High School
-
Alice Lin,
Northview High School
-
Nilai Sarda,
Westminster
-
Ryan Chen,
Brookwood High School
-
Tony Zeng,
Brookwood High School -
Oxford Wang,
Northview High School
-
(TIE) Josh Brunner,
Gwinnett School of Math
Science and Technology and Nithya Jayakumar, Sculley Academy
-
Woo Jae Kim,
Northview High School
-
Chenthuran Abeyakaran,
Chamblee Charter High
School
An item
analysis of the competition problems is included here in PDF format.
State Tournament registration is free, but schools
must be invited. The next State Mathematics Tournament is scheduled
for April 30, 2016.
Back to Top
The
GCTM Middle School Math Tournament was held at Thomson Middle School
in Centerville GA on April 18, 2015. Middle schools across the state
were invited to register up to eight students to compete. The
tournament consisted of a 30 question multiple-choice test with a
45-minute time limit; 10 individual ciphering problems, each problem
with a two-minute time limit; 3 rounds of four pair ciphering
problems (in which students from a school formed teams of two), each
round with a four-minute time limit; and a four-person team “power
question,” in which the team solves a complex problem with a
10-minute time limit.
The tournament is designed to challenge middle
school students and to reinforce classroom skills. However, we also
make sure the students have fun! At the conclusion of the
tournament, students participate in a fun “Frightnin’ Lightnin’”
Round, where students must be quick on the draw to answer math
problems orally. The winners of this round get candy
Trophies went to the top five teams and the top ten
individuals. The top teams are below .
TOP TEAMS:
-
Sculley
Academy, Suwanee
-
Fulton
Science Academy, Suwanee
-
General
Ray Davis Middle School, Conyers
-
Tattnall
Square Academy, Macon
-
First
Presbyterian Day School, Macon
One-hundred seven students from seventeen schools
participated. Sponsors that are members of GCTM only had to pay a
$10 registration fee or submit five multiple-choice questions for
possible inclusion in a future tournament. The next GCTM middle
school tournament is scheduled for April 23, 2016. We hope you will
plan to bring a team of students.
An item
analysis of the competition problems is included here in PDF format.
Back to Top





Back to Top
Three-Act
Tasks are gaining popularity through various blog sites and the
Georgia Department of Education even advocates and provides
resources for them because they provide a simple and refreshing
structure for teaching mathematical concepts. So what are Three-Act
Tasks and how can they contribute to your repertoire of
instructional strategies?
Three-Act Tasks have three parts: (1) a motivating first act that
engages and perplexes students, (2) a second act, driven by student
information, which seeks a solution, and (3) a third act which
facilitates student discussions and presentations of discovered
solutions (Dan Meyer). Three-Act Tasks are applicable in classrooms
of various subject areas and grade levels, and there are a growing
number of online resources that provide a structure and a starting
point for these engaging tasks. Figure 2: Act 1 of the Sugar Packets
Task.
For example, two bloggers who I follow that are proponents for
Three-Act Tasks are
Dan Meyer
and Fawn Nguyen.
Dan Meyer, the keynote speaker for the Georgia Mathematics
Conference (GMC) in 2013, has been creating, using, providing, and
professing the benefits of Three-Act Tasks for many years. Through
his blog, he even provides a data base of over fifty tasks that he
has created. (See Figure 1).

Figure 1: Dan Meyer’s Database of Three-Act Tasks that provides
references, corresponding standards, and a suggested question for
each activity.
I first learned of Three-Act Tasks during his GMC presentation.
Applying what I learned about Three-Act Tasks to a variety of
classes in my middle school classroom, I found that liked the idea
of proposing a scenario to my students, allowing them to come up
with questions about the scenario which they find interesting, and
then letting them choose a question to answer mathematically. I
could use the same task with all of my students and the questions
created would allow them to have a real choice in their learning.
While initially brainstorming possible scenarios, I went online and
found numerous creative ideas—many with videos—ready to be used.
Soon, I had so many ideas that I had a difficult time choosing which
scenarios to use.
Throughout the past few years, I have used lots of Dan Meyer’s
tasks, and a few have proven to be my favorites. The first Three-Act
Task I used with both students and peers (in professional
development) is the
Sugar Packets task (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Act 1 of the Sugar Packets Task
Act One begins with a video of a gentleman sitting at a lunch
counter swallowing sugar packets. The two people on each side of him
give him funny looks as they drink Coke and sweet tea. The video is
used to launch the activity by having students reflect about what
they have seen and generate a list of questions such as, “How many
sugar packets are in a regular drink?” (Don’t worry, this question
always comes up in some form, eventually.) Students continue to pose
questions and are motivated to determine exactly how many sugar
packets are in a Coke or other drinks, including energy drinks,
sports drinks, and other soft drinks. In Act Two, students grouped
themselves based on they wanted to research. At this point, I found
differentiation to be simple because I could provide varied amounts
of support per group according to the needs of the students. For
example, I gave those who needed more support printed information
about a sugar packet and a Coke, while other students who needed
less support were set out to find this information using the
internet, their own drinks they carried into class, or other
resources. As students worked together, most used the concept of
ratios to solve their individual problems. For Act Three, each group
created an informational poster about their drink which included the
mathematics used throughout the task. At the end of the work
session, groups visited each other to compare their solutions. A
rich discussion ensued, centering on comparing the different sugar
levels in the variety of drinks students consumed daily. Many
students stated that they planned on changing their drinking habits
based on this task. While this wasn’t one of my goals, it was
fascinating to see how students had taken true, “real-world” data
and used it to make an actual life decision. Wow!
Creating Three-Act Tasks doesn’t have to be stressful; just remember
that the main focus of the task is to capture the student’s interest
in a non-mathematical way. The first act engages students, the
second act allows students to research something that they are
questioning, and the third act allows students to share their
solutions. When designing your own task, find something that will
spark your students’ interests. For example, one of my colleagues
used a huge bag of Jolly Ranchers to excite her students, which
prompted questions ranging from “How many do I get?” to “How many
cherry (or other flavored) Jolly Ranchers are in the bag?” Another
strategy I have tried is to use a video of my family playing
miniature golf. This ultimately guides my students to ask questions
about angles. Three-Act Tasks may also be used in statistics. Have
you ever used the M&Ms or Skittles task that helps students learn
the properties of probability? This task could easily be converted
into a Three-Act Task by simply providing a picture or video of the
product and then allowing the students to generate questions,
conduct research, and share their findings about the product. Many
mathematical topics can be explored through a variety of
student-generated questions, and Three-Act Tasks absolutely
facilitate student-centered question-and-answer activities in a
truly collaborative manner. Figure 3: Resource from the Georgia
Department of Education The new 2015-2016 Effective Instructional
Practices Guide (Figure 3) from the Georgia Department of Education
includes more information regarding Three-Act Tasks, along with
several web links. This is a great resource to use as you step into
using Three-Act Tasks to engage all your students in mathematics.

Figure 3: Resource from the Georgia Department of Education
Resources/Links:
Karen Kline is a gifted
certified teacher with 18 years of teaching middle and high school
mathematics. She has presented at three GMC conferences,
participates in KSU math circles, and was a teacher leader on KSU’s
Math and Science Partnership grant.
Editor's Note:
If you haven’t tried a Three-Act Task, I
hope this article will inspire you to do your own research
this summer, and search for a few that you think would work
well in your classroom situation next year. I was surprised
at the interest my students showed in these real-life
problems.
In my high school mathematics classes I have
used Dan Meyer’s “Penny Pyramid” problem found here

My students actually begged to work on it
the second and third days. I have also read extensively on
this topic, as I have been excited to see it pop up in
various blogs. I have especially found Mike Wiernicki’s blog
helpful – “Under the Dome”.

We would like to hear about your experiences using
Three-Act Tasks! |
Back to Top
In NCTM’s recent document, Principles to Actions: Ensuring
Success for All (2014) examines the progress in mathematics
education since the initial publication of the Curriculum and
Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM, 1999). While
mathematics education has been at the forefront of education reform,
there is still much to be accomplished if our mathematics classrooms
are to be rich learning environments that focus upon sense making
rather than rule and procedure driven spaces. Principles to
Actions (NCTM, 2014) states that
Too much focus is on learning procedures without any connection to
meaning, understanding, or the applications that require these
procedures.(p.
3)
In light of this
reality, there are recommendations and guidelines to assist teachers
in mathematics classrooms. Of the six guiding principles in this
document, much focus is placed upon the principal of effective
teaching and learning. The Teaching and Learning Principle states:
An excellent mathematics program requires effective teaching that
engages students in meaningful learning through individual and
collaborative experiences that promote their ability to make sense
of mathematical ideas and reason mathematically.
(p. 5)
To promote meaningful
learning, mathematics classroom conversations and interactions must
progress beyond a superficial level of basic recall and algorithm
reproduction. The tasks and activities that students are asked to
solve and the kinds of classroom discussions that take place
emphasize what the teacher or educational institution deems
important and essential. Students who begin with questions or tasks
involving basic recall and algorithmic reproduction come to believe
that that is what mathematics is – something that someone else does
while they reproduce what the “real” mathematicians have invented.
Choosing and
selecting rich mathematical tasks and problems better lends itself
to students recognizing that mathematics is a human activity that
each one has the ability to do. Rich tasks also lend themselves to
meaningful mathematical discourse – a goal that is seen in a number
of mathematics education reform and standards documents (NCTM, 1989;
NCTM, 1991; NCTM, 1995; NCTM, 2000; NCTM, 2007; NCTM, 2014).
Principles to Actions (NCTM, 2014, p. 29) specifically states
that educators should facilitate meaningful mathematical
discourse:
Effective teaching of mathematics facilitates discourse among
students to build shared understanding of mathematical ideas by
analyzing and comparing student approaches and arguments. (p. 29)
While choosing
mathematics tasks to advance and promote mathematics learning is the
beginning of providing opportunities for such rich discourse, asking questions and facilitating discourse
is also an important aspect of advancing mathematical understanding.
Simply asking
students to explain or reproduce a taught algorithm does not
necessarily result in students building mathematical ideas. At
times, such discourse can be found to undermine a student developing
big ideas in mathematics. Principles to Actions (NCTM,
2014) 35) also states that educators should pose purposeful
questions:
Effective teaching of mathematics uses purposeful questions to
assess and advance students’ reasoning and sense making about
important mathematical ideas and relationships.
(p. 35)
In classroom
mathematical discussions, the goal should be upon questions that
encourage students to make sense of the mathematics in an
intellectually autonomous environment. The Professional Standards
for Teaching Mathematics (1991) suggests questions that are
still relevant today:
v
Helping students work together to
make sense of mathematics.
“What do others think about what Janine said?”
“Do you agree? Disagree?”
“Does anyone have the same answer but a different way to explain
it?”
“Would you ask the rest of the class that question?”
“Do you understand what they are saying?”
“Can you convince the rest of us that that makes sense?”
v
Helping students work to rely
more on themselves to determine whether something is mathematically
correct.
“Why do you think that?”
“Why is that true?”
“How did you reach that conclusion?”
“Does that make sense?”
“Can you make a model to show that?”
v
Helping students learn to reason
mathematically.
“Does that always work?”
“Is that true for all cases?”
“Can you think of a counterexample?”
“How could you prove that?”
“What assumptions are you making?”
v
Helping students learn to
conjecture, invent, and solve problems.
“What would happen if…? What if not?”
“Do you see a pattern?”
“What are some possibilities here?”
“Can you predict the next one? What about the last one?”
“How did you think about the problem?”
“What decision do you think he should make?”
“What is alike and what is different about your method of
solution and hers?”
v
Helping students to connect
mathematics, its ideas, and its applications.
“How does this relate to …?”
“What ideas that we have learned before were useful in solving
this problem?”
“Have we solved a problem like this before?”
“What uses of mathematics did you find in the newspaper last
night?”
“Can you give me an example of …?” (pp. 3-4)
In facilitating rich
mathematical course and posing purposeful questions, it is
imperative to remember to honor and respect students’ mathematical
ideas. Students are accustomed to classrooms where a question asked
implies that their idea or answer is incorrect. This means that a
teacher must make it clear to students that questions do not imply
that an idea or solution is incorrect but that an important part of
doing and learning mathematics involves discussion. Another
important issue for teachers is to remember to wait after
posing a question so that students have adequate time for
reflection. Waiting can indeed be an important part of the
discussions and questions.
As the mathematics education community continues to push for
engagement of all students in rich mathematics learning, being
cognizant of the kinds of questions that are posed in mathematics
discussions can support in this endeavor.
References
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989).
Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics.
Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional
standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment
standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles
and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2007). Mathematics
teaching today: improving practice, improving student learning.
Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles
to actions: ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA:
NCTM.
Additional Resources
http://www.primas-project.eu/servlet/supportBinaryFiles?referenceId=4&supportId=1362
http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/literacynumeracy/inspire/research/CBS_AskingEffectiveQuestions.pdf
http://nrich.maths.org/2473
http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_17_September_2013/23.pdf
http://www.fcps.org/cms/lib02/MD01000577/Centricity/Domain/97/The
art of questioning in math class.pdf
http://www.utdanacenter.org/mathtoolkit/support/questioning.php
Sandra Davis Trowell, Ph.D.,
is an assistant professor in the Mathematics & Computer Science
Department at Valdosta State University. She is interested in how
students learn mathematics and enjoys working with prospective and
practicing teachers.
Back to Top
 Do
you know someone that is outstanding as a teacher of
mathematics and deserves an award? This is the time to
nominate someone for one of the many GCTM awards.
Visit
GCTM's Awards page to complete a nomination form.
Back to Top
As mathematics educators, this is our motivation for
doing the job we love so much-----teaching! As we strive to help our
students reach their potential, we must continue to fill our “tool
boxes” with effective teaching practices. Once again this year GCTM
is providing one of the best opportunities for professional
development, the 2015 Georgia Mathematics Conference. This
year’s theme: “Growing Student Potential in Mathematics” is
built around the Eight Effective Teaching Practices outlined in
NCTM’s publication, Principals to Action.
The Georgia Mathematics Conference Board is busy
preparing for this great event and we need YOU. Every year, this
conference features many of Georgia’s best educators and we want to
continue to increase that number. There is no better place to show
off the great things that are happening in classrooms across our
state than at Rock Eagle. If you are willing to present or know
someone who would be willing to present, the speaker proposal forms
will be posted at the
GCTM website very soon or
email me.
Join us October 14 – 16, 2015 at Rock Eagle!
Back to Top
I cannot thank Cheryl Hughes enough her incredible support
throughout my internship which has prepared me to become the new
eREFLECTIONS Editor. Simply put, she is an inspiration. As I embark
on this exciting new journey, I can only hope to continue in her
footsteps by providing high-quality materials that enlighten,
inform, and excite mathematics teachers throughout the state.
eREFLECTIONS will continue to be a preeminent platform for the
voices of mathematics teachers and teacher educators as the
landscape of teaching and learning mathematics changes through
curriculum reform, technological innovations, and educational
research. Readers can depend on each issue to describe how GCTM
provides professional development opportunities and represents our
readers’ voices on a statewide and national level through events
like Math Day at the Capitol, NCTM Conferences, STEM-Georgia
Conferences, and the Biennial Institute for Georgia Legislators.
Within each issue, eREFLECTIONS will capture and showcase our
readers’ ideas and thoughts about content ideas and best practices
of teaching mathematics. We welcome authors of all experience
levels, educational backgrounds, and grade-level specialties to
contribute tips and tricks, lesson plans, mathematical puzzles,
reflections, words of wisdom, and research. Over the next year, our
issues will focus on a theme of “Diving Deeper” in order to
highlight how mathematics teachers help students make sense of
mathematics on a deeper level through favorite lessons, resources,
and professional development opportunities. The contributions of our
stakeholders help this publication grow alongside our community and
provide an ear and voice for those who have a passion for students,
teaching, and mathematics. Do you have something to share? Please
consider being part of eREFLECTIONS team by answering our
Call for Manuscripts.
Back to Top
CSRA
RESA and Georgia Regents University will present a two-day
conference to showcase educators from across the CSRA to share
strategies that increase student performance and mastery of the
instructional shifts in literacy and numeracy. Speakers include Dr.
Zach Kehlear, Dean of the GRU College of Education and former
Associate Dean for the University of South Carolina College of
Education; and Dr. Naesha Parks, Principal of Evans Elementary
School and author of the book "The Heart Feels First."
WHEN: June 24-25, 8 a.m. to 3:45 p.m.
(7:30 a.m. registration)
WHERE: Georgia Regents University,
University Hall
COST: Free
PLUS: 1 PLU upon completion of the
two-day conference
REGISTRATION: Click the red button
below. Use Course Number PL 1580.

For more information, visit
csraresa.net or contact Faith Hopkins at 706-556-6225 or
faith@csraresa.org.
Back to Top

Back to Top
Do you need some supplies to carry out some of the
lessons you plan for your students, but you are
lacking the funds needed to purchase these
materials?
Visit
GCTM's Grants page to apply for a mini-grant or
grant.
|
Back to Top
Spring Cleaning
Please visit your home page on the GCTM site. Update
your information including school name, grade level and alternate
email. Make your home email the principal email used to send you
eREFLECTIONS and other information. There are at least 4 school
systems in Georgia that have blocks on email info we send. Home
address is better!
Volunteers
Are you willing to be a GCTM helper? It takes many
hands to have a conference, academies, competitions, and a journal!
If you can lend your hands and heart, just enter your interests in
the volunteer field on your personal record on the database.
Missing Persons
Can you help us locate addresses or information
about the following members. Mail has been returned as Unknown. Any
help you can give will be appreciated. Send any info to
secddc@aol.com.
- Jerinda Armour - Valdosta
- Melvis Atkinson – Atlanta
- Nancy Bates - Cornelia
- Larry Black – Toccoa
- Gordon Boggs – Lakeland, FL
- Amanda Brown – Swainsboro
- Lex Buchanan – Smyrna
- Jane Butler - Leslie
- Betty DeWitt – Savannah
- Richard Dunn – Augusta
- Ernest Forthman – Albany
- Dalene Griffin - Hoboken
- Consuela Jack -McDonough
|
- Diane Koart - Columbus
- Phyllis Marshall - Florida
- Paula McCormick – Brooklet
- Blanche McElfresh – Griffin
- Patrice Moore – Otto, NC
- Sharlene Pignataro – Savannah
- Melva Stevens – Hawkinsville
- Alice Vessell - Newnan
- Allene Wakefield – Carrollton
- Glenda Ward – Kennesaw
- Don Williams - Albany
- Carol Woods – Lawrenceville
|
Student Members
If you are completing your degree we encourage you
to continue your membership as you begin your teaching career. The
fee of $20 is just a small amount to spend for all that GCTM offers
you! Be sure to update your email address as it changes. A home
address will assure you receive information sent by GCTM.
If you are continuing your college status, be sure
to update your Snail and email addresses, and renew your account for
the next year!
Back to Top
Attend this year’s GCTM’s Summer
Academy for K-8 teachers:
-
Gain information and support for revisions to
the K-8 mathematics curriculum.
-
Experience hands-on activities and lessons to
boost student understandings.
-
Find out how to make your students’ thinking
visible.
-
Enhance your questioning skills as a tool to
assess student learning.
-
Utilize technology as a learning tool for
students.
-
And much, much more!!
All of this and more in a two-day professional
development opportunity! Each session will be grade-specific and
held at your choice of four locations/dates.
The cost is only $120 non-member/$90 member for the
entire 2-days packed with great ideas and materials full of rigor
and relevance to use in your classroom this fall.
What a great way to use title funds!
Visit
GCTM's Academies page and register today!
Seating is limited!
See you this summer!
Back to Top
NCTM Report
Excerpted from NCTM Affiliates News & NCTM e-blast & NCTM
Annual Meeting Summer 2015 by Dottie Whitlow |
NCTM Annual Meeting & Exposition Review
The 2015 NCTM Annual Meeting &
Exposition was held in Boston, Massachusetts, April 15-18, 2015.
Nearly 10,000 mathematics educators were gathered for the event!
NCTM President Diane Briars presented Major Initiatives for NCTM at
the Affiliates Delegate meeting. Major Initiatives for NCTM include:
The 2015 NCTM Annual Meeting &
Exposition was held in Boston, Massachusetts, April 15-18, 2015.
Nearly 10,000 mathematics educators were gathered for the event!
NCTM President Diane Briars presented Major Initiatives for NCTM at
the Affiliates Delegate meeting. Major Initiatives for NCTM include:
The NCTM website has been remodeled!
Visit
www.nctm.org to check out the new format! The NCTM-Hunt videos
and Principles to Actions resources are already available there.

Delegates Passed One Resolution
One resolution was passed by the 66th Delegate
Assembly. It requested that NCTM ensure that transportation is
provided and available to delegates when Affiliate Delegate meetings
are scheduled to begin or end during times that the NCTM shuttle
service is not in service.
Any passed resolutions are forwarded to the NCTM
Board of Directors as recommendations for review at its July
meeting. Board’s actions on each resolution will be posted online in
August. Affiliate leaders and Delegate Assembly participants will be
notified through the Affiliate News electronic newsletter when the
Board’s actions have been posted this fall.
2014 Summer Interactive Institutes for Pre-K–12
Join
us in San Diego or Chicago this summer for NCTM's Interactive
Institutes. Sessions begin in July, and topics are Algebra Readiness
for Every Student for Grades 6-8,
Connecting Number and
Operations in the Classroom for Pre-K–Grade 5, and
Engaging Students in
Learning: Mathematical Practices and Process Standards for Grades
9-12.
Register early and save up to $40 with discounted rates!
For more information, go to:
http://www.nctm.org/institutes/.

NCTM Boston Affiliates Meeting 2015
Cathy Martin, NCTM Board of Directors, Dottie Whitlow, NCTM
Representative, Betty Long, NCTM Southern Regional Director
Principles to Actions
The widespread adoption of college- and career-readiness standards,
including adoption in the United States of the Common Core State
Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM) by forty-five of the fifty states,
provides an opportunity to reenergize and focus NCTM’s commitment to
significant improvement in mathematics education. Thus, the release
of NCTM’s latest publication, Principles to Actions, which is
designed to fill the gap between the development and adoption of
CCSSM and other standards and the enactment of practices, policies,
programs, and actions required for their widespread and successful
implementation. The overarching message is that effective teaching
is the nonnegotiable core that ensures that all students learn
mathematics at high levels and that such teaching requires a range
of actions at the state or provincial, district, school, and
classroom levels. Get your copy at
nctm.org shop online.
Back to Top
President –
Kaycie Maddox
Past President and
Treasurer – Dan Funsch
Intern Treasurer
– Nickey Ice
Executive Director –
Tom Ottinger
Membership Director –
Susan Craig
NCTM Representative –
Dottie Whitlow
Secretary –
Debbie Kohler
IT Director –
Paul Oser
eREFLECTIONS Editor –
Cheryl Hughes
VP for Advocacy –
Denise Huddlestun
VP for Constitution and
Policy – Patti Barrett
VP for Honors and Awards –
Peggy Pool
VP for Regional Services
– Valerie Lemon
VP for Competitions –
Chuck Garner
Conference Board Chair –
Tammy Donalson
Intern eREFLECTIONS
Editor –
Becky Gammill
|
Back to Top |